Conventional comminution reduces particle size and hopes liberation follows. HPSA targets liberation directly — which changes the economics of everything downstream.
Both approaches aim to separate the valuable mineral from the gangue. They go about it very differently — and that difference shows up in grade, recovery and operating cost.
Cleaner liberation lifts the valuable mineral reporting to concentrate, across sulfides, oxides and industrial minerals.
More saleable product across the same plant and overhead — modules bolt into existing circuits in weeks.
Rising recovery and quality spread plant cost across more product, cutting the all-in cost per tonne of mineral.
The HPSA unit needs no grinding media and no chemicals of its own — liberation is purely mechanical, with no consumables to dose or replenish.
Skid-mounted units with short lead and install times, minimal shutdown, and straightforward scaling from pilot to production.
Demonstrated across 150+ ore campaigns, with commercial installations in North America and independent verification.
HPSA's advantages are real, but they only matter if they show up in the economics of the mineral you sell. That's the lens we use — not abstract efficiency claims.
More of the target mineral reporting to concentrate instead of being lost to tailings.
More metal per tonne of oreMore saleable product handled across the same plant, people and overhead.
More output, same footprintThe all-in cost to produce each tonne of valuable mineral — the figure that decides projects.
Lower cost per tonne of productBecause HPSA concentrates value into less mass and needs no grinding media of its own, the same changes that improve economics can also reduce the volume of material handled and the physical footprint of the plant — relevant wherever HPSA replaces or supplements conventional milling, and in tailings and remediation work.
The argument is only worth as much as the result on your ore. Let's run the numbers on your material.
Talk to Optimise Minerals